Folio Search · free preview

Papers on “generative AI ChatGPT education academic integrity”

Live results from Semantic Scholar, CrossRef and OpenAlex — no account needed to look.

1. ChatGPT and the rise of generative AI: Threat to academic integrity?

   Damian Okaibedi Eke · 2023 · Journal of Responsible Technology · 435 cites

2. Generative AI and Academic Integrity in Higher Education

   Sathy Akter* · 2026 · British Journal of Arts and Humanities · 223 cites

   This research report examines the impact of Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) on academic integrity in higher e­ducation on a global scale while specifically analyzing professional education in the USA. In this era marked by the widespread presence of Large Language Models like ChatGPT, DeepSeek and Gemini, the traditional ways of assessment are challenged as never before. This study refers to the literature published in the last five years (2021-2026) to assess the pedagogical, ethical, and technical aspects of the use of AI. The analysis finds that there seems to be an important change in the "honor code" approach of the traditional system for a more complex system that has been r

3. Student Perceptions of AI-Assisted Writing and Academic Integrity: Ethical Concerns, Academic Misconduct, and Use of Generative AI in Higher Education

   Brady Lund, Nishith Reddy Mannuru, Zoë Abbie Teel, et al. · 2025 · AI in Education · 44 cites

   The rise of generative AI in higher education has disrupted our traditional understandings of academic integrity, moving our focus from clear-cut infractions to evolving ethical judgment. In this study, a survey of 401 students from major U.S. universities provides insight into how beliefs, behaviors, and policy awareness intersect in shaping how students interact with AI-assisted writing. The findings indicate that students’ ethical beliefs—not institutional policies—are the strongest predictors of perceived misconduct and actual AI use in writing. Policy awareness was found to have no significant effect on ethical judgments or behavior. Instead, students who believe AI writing is cheating

4. Addressing student use of generative AI in schools and universities through academic integrity reporting

   Steven Peterson · 2025 · Frontiers in Education · 18 cites

5. Purpose before policy: academic integrity, generative AI, and rhetorical stance

   Tristan B. Taylor, Travis LaCroix · 2026 · Higher Education · 1 cite

   Abstract The release of ChatGPT in 2022 sparked polarised responses in higher education, from rapid curricular adoption to warnings about academic misconduct and threats to academic integrity. This article argues that whether generative AI (GenAI) use constitutes misconduct depends on a prior question: what is the university’s purpose? We contend that (apparent) rising GenAI-related misconduct cases reflect structural incoherence in the neo-liberal university, where technological enthusiasm, corporate influence, and policy enforcement often conflict. Such misalignment produces moral and institutional ambiguity, leaving students accountable for behaviours implicitly shaped b

6. Faculty and Student Perceptions of Generative AI Use, ChatGPT and Academic Integrity: Connecting Findings to Assessment Redesign

   Han Nee Chong, Eugene Guillian · 2026 · Intersection: A Journal at the Intersection of Assessment and Learning

   This study examines faculty and student perceptions of generative artificial intelligence (GenAI), particularly ChatGPT, and its implications for academic integrity and assessment design in higher education. Using a cross-sectional survey design, quantitative and qualitative data were collected from 82 faculty and 190 students to explore attitudes, experiences, and practices related to AI use. Findings indicate broad recognition of GenAI’s potential to enhance learning efficiency and feedback, alongside concerns about academic dishonesty and the erosion of critical thinking and writing skills. From an assessment perspective, these concerns highlight the importance of designing tasks that mak

7. Generative AI ChatGPT in Islamic Economics Education Critical Literacy and Academic Ethics

   Laelaturramadani Laelaturramadani · 2026 · Journal of Knowledge and Collaboration

   This study explores the utilization of Generative AI, specifically ChatGPT, in Islamic Economics Education, focusing on its impact on students' critical literacy and academic ethics. Employing a qualitative research design through a literature review, this study systematically analyzes relevant academic sources published in the past five years to investigate how AI tools, such as ChatGPT, are being integrated into the learning process in higher education, particularly in Islamic economics programs. The findings reveal that ChatGPT enhances learning efficiency by providing students with immediate access to complex economic concepts and supporting autonomous learning. However, concerns about a

8. Generative AI in Academic Chinese Writing for Native speakers: A Case Study of ChatGPT and Ernie Bot

   Su Yuan, Qiyao Ma, Ka Ching Chau, et al. · 2026 · STiLE - Scholarship of Teaching in Language Education

   With the rise of Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI), academic writing has undergone significant changes, prompting educators to adapt their teaching methods. This qualitative case study explores the integration of GenAI in academic Chinese writing education for native Chinese speakers within the context of Hong Kong universities. Through systematic evaluation of ChatGPT 3.5 and Ernie Bot 3.5 across academic writing tasks from a Chinese communication skills course, this study examines how GenAI tools can help students enhance their academic writing skills. GenAI performance is evaluated across content, structure, and language use in academic Chinese writing. Findings indicate that whi